CorePower Yoga Told a State Investigator There Were No Other Altered Timesheets. Then I Got the Audit Records.

Location: Colorado.

I filed a wage claim against CorePower Yoga after I believed my hours and pay records did not match the classes and shifts I actually worked.

CorePower received the Notice of Complaint on April 10, 2026. My understanding was that their response was due May 1, but from the investigation file I later obtained, it appears they continued submitting materials to the state through June 2. I have not found anything showing they were granted an extension.

In a June 2 submission to the state investigator, CorePower’s outside counsel stated that CorePower’s HR and Payroll departments reviewed my records and substantiated that my timesheets had been improperly altered on three separate occasions. The same submission also stated that CorePower did not identify any other instances of altered timesheets.

Two days later, on June 4, the state issued a Determination of Compliance.

At the time, I had not been given CorePower’s response, the June 2 submission, or the underlying Dayforce audit records. I only got those records after filing a Colorado open records request.

After reviewing the Dayforce audit records myself, I found entries that appear inconsistent with CorePower’s statement that there were no other instances. Some records appear to show me clocked out while I was teaching scheduled classes. Other scheduled classes do not appear to have a matching paid-time entry. I also found additional edits that I do not believe were addressed in CorePower’s submission.

The metadata for the determination references an internal file titled "4834-25_Determination of Compliance_6-1-2026.docx," which appears to contain a June 1, 2026 date. I do not know whether that date is legally significant, but it raised questions for me because CorePower's supplemental submission was not received until June 2, 2026.

My questions:

1. If a company tells a state wage investigator it found no other altered timesheets, but the employee later obtains audit records that appear to show more issues, what is the legal significance of that?
2. Does it matter that I was not allowed to review or respond to CorePower’s submissions before the state issued its determination?
3. Should newly obtained audit records like this generally be raised through an appeal, reconsideration request, or separate wage claim?

Disclaimer: The statements contained herein are made in good faith and are based upon my personal knowledge, recollection, and understanding of events, records, communications, and administrative proceedings related to my wage claim. To the extent any statement reflects an interpretation, characterization, or inference, it is offered as my personal understanding and not as a final factual finding, legal conclusion, or adjudication of liability as to any person or entity. This post is submitted solely for the purpose of seeking general legal and procedural information.