Jacinta Allan, you played into the hands of PHON but not giving the witch comments the indifference they deserve.

Jactina, you should have shrugged it off. I am not being hypocrit here. As a man working in state and federal govt deparments I've been told I am a biological deadend because I don't have kids, I have had many derogatory comments made about my looks by both men and some women and been told to cover up my muscles on casual Friday because some very body positive (and odious) woman couldn't help but look. This has all happened to me and I've heard of similar stories of other men. Maybe some narcissistic elitist men are pulling the strings but many men get brutalised by the bullshit and your narratives of making it about all men and teaching women to be victims is not playing well with the public. They are turning away from what they see as elite mediocrities wanting special advantage and using the misogyny shield to cover for competency issues. Let me give some recent examples:

Professional Dilettante Hannah Ferguson, while speaking at Meet The Press (invites not always based on merit) claims being labelled an “influencer” was misogyny. Really? So Manosphere “influencers” while being horribly misogynistic are also victims of misogyny? Since the ABC is still platforming her, they can put that vexing question to her. The question I put to the ABC is why they are still platforming a person who publicly celebrated the assassination of a public figure. Unedifying. Usually that is Career Kryptonite? I didn’t like Kirk at all but professional journalists always refrain from such displays.

Breakdancer Raygun couldn't perform a single point scoring move at the Olympics but went on a media blitz crying misogyny to cover for the fact she should not have qualified for the Olympics and bring Australia's sporting reputation into disrepute. She still fell on her feet with lunch with Richard Branson and Boy George. I'm sure she will live through the jsutified ublic backlash.

I also checked back into my old Alma Mater of Curtin University recently and saw examples of young female students engaging confirmation bias in their interactions with male students. I witnessed 2 female students talking loudly on the 6^(th) floor of the library which is quiet study only and when a male warden asked them to decamp to the foyer or another floor they walked off in a huff ready to tell the world about the misogyny. If they had have just waited about 20 minutes they would have seen the exact same behaviour directed at 2 male students who were talking loudly in the same area. They were doing the wrong thing anyway but like elite women they want the unfairness in their favour like a handful of toxic men they can point towards.

Then we have women homeless getting plenty of attention as if male homeless should have sucked it up. Why is women being homeless need highlighting? Could be gender bias from a female dominant progressive media landscape? Anyway, here is where there is some gender bias that cannot be ignored:

Women have lower standards of entry to police, fire brigade and military. The reasons given for that are that are straight from the management consulting firm playbook of slanted narratives. I think the official reason is that people with lower physical strength often have greater intelligence. Well yeah, and there has never been nerdy, weedy men of high intelligence? Those men must accept they are men when they don’t cut it but women can get waved through on lower standards. That smacks of gender-based cronyism does it not?

So us non-elite members of public have got a whiff of this and have been hit over the head with the consulting firm narratives that produces these slanted horseshit arguments while at the same time some elite women do appear to weaponise victimhood narratives.

So there are times you need to give the nastiness indifference (it is the opposite of love, not hate), and if you want to change the world for the better change it for everyone because many non elites (women AND men) get trashed by its morally ambiguous and sometimes psychopathic nature.