SpaceX prices its IPO today at a $1.75T valuation. BTC is down ~33% YTD with $3.1B in ETF outflows. How are you positioned for the "liquidity drain"?
SpaceX prices its IPO today at $135/share, raising ~$75B at a $1.75T valuation. Trading is expected to start tomorrow, June 12.
Reported demand approached $250B — so there's a mountain of unfilled allocation money about to look for a home.
SpaceX itself holds 18,712 BTC, bought at an average of ~$35,300. That treasury goes public with the company.
Meanwhile BTC is down roughly a third YTD and spot ETFs have bled ~$3.1B.
The drain case: SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic raises are estimated to absorb $240B+ of risk capital by year-end. That's the same pool of money that chases BTC upside, and there are already reports of retail selling coins specifically to free up cash for IPO shares.
The counter-case: one-off capital reallocations aren't structural outflows — Bitwise's CEO has argued crypto traders shouldn't be jealous, and big listings have historically marked local sentiment bottoms more often than new downtrends. There's also the reflexive angle nobody prices: a $1.75T public company now carries BTC on its balance sheet at a ~3x unrealized gain. Strange kind of bearish.
What I actually care about is how the perp market is pricing this, not the narrative:
Funding: -0.0008% — it's been negative. Shorts paying to press, or just no bid?
OI has been falling while price chops — to me that reads like de-risking, not fresh shorts. Open to other reads.
Quarterly basis at 3% to 4% — backwardation into the listing.
So: flat into the open, fading the drain narrative, or pressing shorts? More interested in your reasoning and sizing than your direction.
Not financial advice. Sources in comments.
Posted Jun 11, 2026, 2:36 AM UTC