How were black enslaved people in the West Indies able to revolt so much more successfully than African Americans

This thought came to me in the shower as a somewhat surface consensus that settled into my mind due to history class and various media that I've seen. We often learn about the massive, world-altering success of the Haitian Revolution, or the major, multi-island uprisings across the Caribbean (like Tacky’s War in Jamaica).

Yet, when looking at the antebellum American South, while there were definitely notable rebellions and constant acts of resistance (like Nat Turner or Harriet Tubman), they never managed to overthrow the system or seize geographic territory on a massive scale.

From a historical perspective, what structural, demographic, or geographic factors made large-scale, successful revolts so much more achievable in the West Indies compared to the United States? Is just that black enslaved people in the West Indies outnumbered white people?