⚖️ RI judge refers DOJ lawyers for review Ruling cites misconduct in federal case 👇

A Rhode Island federal judge has referred Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys for review after issuing a sharply critical ruling in a case involving transgender-related medical records, raising questions about legal conduct and federal litigation practices.

In a June 2026 decision, U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy issued a detailed ruling rejecting a federal subpoena that sought extensive, unredacted medical records from Rhode Island Hospital, part of Brown Health. The judge found that the government’s handling of the case raised serious concerns, including issues related to jurisdiction and the way the case was presented in court.

The ruling also highlighted concerns about parallel legal actions filed in other jurisdictions, including a case brought before a federal court in Texas, which the judge said complicated the proceedings. Legal experts note that such cross-jurisdictional strategies can raise questions about forum selection and procedural fairness.

Referrals of federal attorneys for internal review are relatively rare and typically involve questions about courtroom conduct, accuracy of representations, or adherence to professional standards. The DOJ has not publicly detailed its response, and the review process may take time.

The case is part of broader national litigation involving transgender healthcare and privacy rights, areas that have seen increasing legal challenges in both state and federal courts.

Do you think courts should take stronger action when government attorneys are found to have acted improperly?