Positions: \~4K shares currently.

Got some SPCX during IPO and I'm buying more.

TLDR:  
\#1 SPCX, like the rocket, goes up and will clear orbit before crashing in October when lockups expire.  
\#2 Valuation of the stock doesn't matter - it's the float that matters. Almost no one who can sell got in below IPO price  
\#3 The forced buyers are the boomers and their 401k funds and those tracking QQQ. Hedgies know this, and now we do too. The buy is up to 45% of the float.  
\#4 Apes strong together - most retial brokers are giving penalties for selling before 15/30/60/90 days, so all we have to do is not be paper handed regards.  
\#4 Options released next week = more gamma squeeze.  
\#5 Macro is short term bullish if we continue to work towards and away from a peace deal  
\#6 Also, **everyone hates Elon** on Reddit so an inverse is obvious. **I hate Elon too**, but I like money.

See below (AI formatted but all events fact-checked)

# SPCX: The Mechanical Setup for the Next Two to Three Weeks

SpaceX (SPCX) began trading on June 12, 2026 at a $135 offer price and a \~$1.75 trillion valuation — the largest IPO in history at roughly $75 billion raised. It opened around $150, traded as high as \~30% above offer intraday, and closed its first session up about 19%. What makes the weeks immediately ahead unusual isn't the story or the valuation. It's the plumbing: a set of *mechanical*, largely pre-scheduled flows that, for a brief window, tilt the supply-demand balance heavily toward demand.

# The core asymmetry: demand is front-loaded, supply is back-loaded

The single most important feature of this setup is timing. Over roughly the next three weeks, a wave of forced, price-insensitive buying is scheduled to hit the stock — while essentially zero new share supply is scheduled to be released. That ordering reverses later in the summer. The bull case for *this specific window* rests almost entirely on that mismatch, not on any view about SpaceX's business.

Three structural pillars drive it.

# 1. Forced index buying into a tiny float

SpaceX floated only about 3–4% of the company. Against a \~$1.75T cap, that's a tradeable share base of roughly $65–75 billion — extraordinarily thin for a company this size. Into that thin float, index providers have lined up a series of mandatory additions, and the funds tracking those indexes have to buy regardless of price:

* **CRSP / Vanguard (VTI, VUG)** — first in line under CRSP's new five-trading-day fast-track, likely around June 19. Vanguard's CRSP-tracking funds manage over $3 trillion; estimates for the resulting buy run $15–25 billion, though this is the least certain figure (see caveats).
* **FTSE Russell** — per FTSE Russell's formal notice, SpaceX enters the Russell 1000, Russell Top 200 and other Russell US indexes effective after the close on June 26 (effective June 29), under its new fast-entry rule.
* **MSCI** — added to its standard and large-cap indexes effective June 29.
* **Nasdaq-100 fast entry** — likely early July (15 trading days post-IPO). With over $1.4 trillion tracking the Nasdaq-100 and an expected SPCX weight near 0.5–0.7%, analysts (BNP Paribas, others) estimate $7–8 billion of buying here.

Aggregated, near-term mechanical buying estimates cluster around **$22–30 billion**. Measured against a \~$65–75 billion float, that is roughly **30–45% of the entire tradeable float** that index funds must acquire inside about three weeks. Bloomberg Intelligence has estimated that Russell and Nasdaq-100 funds alone would absorb around a quarter of the public float, and that once benchmarked active money is included, total index-driven demand can exceed half of all public shares.

For context: in an ordinary large-cap index inclusion, forced buying is a low-single-digit percentage of float, and the studied price impact is a modest, largely front-run bump of a few percent. This is an order of magnitude different. When mandatory demand approaches the size of the available float, the normal smooth-supply models stop applying.

# 2. Options listing (June 16) and dealer hedging

Listed options on SPCX are expected to begin trading Tuesday, June 16 — two trading days after the IPO. On a hyped, low-float name, retail options demand is overwhelmingly skewed toward calls. When dealers sell those calls, they are short gamma and tend to hedge by buying the underlying as it rises — a feedback loop that can amplify upside moves in exactly this kind of thin-float setup. The combination of a microscopic float and a suddenly active options market is a recognized recipe for outsized moves.

# 3. No scheduled supply until late August

SpaceX deliberately avoided a single-date lockup cliff. Instead it built a staggered, rolling release. Crucially, **nothing scheduled comes off lockup in the next two to three weeks.** More than 60% of pre-IPO shares sit under extended lockup; Elon Musk's \~42% stake (85% of voting power) is under a separate 366-day restriction that doesn't lift until around June 2027.

The first scheduled time-based tranche releases about 7% of eligible shares at 70 days — roughly August 21. The first *event-based* unlock comes only after the Q2 earnings report, expected in September. So during the exact window when forced demand peaks, the only meaningful supply that *can* hit the market is the \~5% directed-share program (\~27.8 million shares, \~$3.75 billion) that was granted with no lockup — and even that is discretionary, may not be sold, and is small relative to the index buying it would have to offset.

# The macro tailwind: a risk-on tape

The mechanical setup doesn't operate in a vacuum — it lands into a market backdrop that, right now, is turning supportive, and that matters for a high-beta name like SPCX.

As of mid-June, the U.S. and Iran appear to be moving toward de-escalation. Officials from both countries, with Pakistani involvement, have signaled that negotiations are advancing toward a written framework both sides largely support — reportedly including reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a phased, performance-based arrangement — even as difficult technical questions remain unresolved. Markets have responded the way they typically do to easing geopolitical risk: Wall Street's rebound extended on the breakthrough headlines, and oil fell more than 3% as the threat of an energy-supply shock receded.

This is a meaningful backdrop for SPCX specifically, because of what risk-on tapes do:

* **Lower oil and easing inflation fears support rate-sensitive, long-duration assets** — exactly the bucket the most expensive, least-profitable growth names sit in. When a comparable Iran ceasefire was struck earlier in 2026, the Nasdaq-100 jumped nearly 3% in a session and speculative AI/high-beta names (Nvidia, Tesla, AMD, Micron) rose 4–10%. The most expensive, highest-beta thing in the index tends to move the most in both directions, and SPCX is now precisely that.
* **Risk appetite amplifies the mechanical flows.** Forced index buying and call-heavy options positioning push hardest when the broad tape is cooperating. A market that's chasing risk magnifies a low-float squeeze; a market in retreat blunts it. So a de-escalation-driven rally and the SPCX-specific plumbing can reinforce each other in the same window.

In other words, the index-inclusion calendar would be a tailwind on its own, but it's arriving into a macro environment that — for now — is leaning the same direction rather than fighting it.

Bullish thesis for SPCX into the summer