&#x200B;

​Shipd.ai is operating a completely rigged system. The platform’s definition of "cheating" isn't formally documented anywhere. Instead, reviewers invent rules on the fly, weaponizing unwritten constraints to arbitrarily reject submissions and ban users whenever it suits them.

​But what happens when those same reviewers are caught breaking the exact rules they use to terminate regular participants? Absolutely nothing.

​Look at the attached chat log.

​A "designated" Shipd.ai reviewer submitted a solution that clearly utilized pseudo-labeling. If a standard user submitted this, they would be hit with an instant, permanent ban for "cheating" based on guidelines that don't even exist in the platform's official documentation. But when a participant catches the reviewer red-handed and asks if they are going to reject their own submission, the reviewer’s response is sheer arrogance:

​"Ahh, forgot to copy paste rules. Don't worry on that. Someone else will look into it."

​Zero accountability. No penalties. A regular user gets their account nuked and their work stolen over phantom rule violations, while a reviewer laughs it off as a clerical error, passes the review to a buddy, and still probably cashes out the $300 bounty despite what was said.

​They are gatekeeping the payouts by holding the community to a moving target of invisible standards, while entirely exempting themselves from any oversight. Shipd.ai isn't a competitive platform; it's a closed loop where reviewers make the rules up as they go to ban the competition, protect their own ecosystem, and secure their own payouts. The entire platform is fundamentally compromised.

Shipd.ai is a scam: Reviewers make up undocumented rules to ban users, then break them to pocket $300 payouts