I decided for simplicitys sake to give each country only one regional classification, so where as French Guyana probably would have been in the "Latin American-Carribean" if it would've been independent, it's now placed within the "Western" category.  
There are some border regions (especially around the "Arab" region) where classifying the countries wasn't so easy (Israel and the caucasian countries were very hard to place for example) so i'd like to hear your thoughts about which region these countries should belong to.  
Something i'd also really like to hear your thoughts on is wether countries like Mauritius for example, that is now placed within the African group, should rather be placed within the "Latin American-Carribean" category due to their cultural, demographical and historical similarities.  
This post is meant as a discussion post meaning that the idea is for you all to discuss what you think of this concept, wether it's about wether this is a good approach to "dividing" the world into parts or wether it's about how we should "divide" the world if we decide it's a good idea, so please don't be afraid to state your opinion.

Also, i'm sorry for the use of a mapchart map. I know that it's sloppy and looked down upon, however i think it was the best tool avialable to me for this particular situation and thus i used it.

Also, i know it's hard to see, but PNG and the pacific island nations are part of their own group and the carribean island nations are part of the "Latin American" category.

My idea for how we should categorise the world (instead of normal continents)