Georgia Tech has no shortage of strong opinions. Class group chats, project teams, startup people, football weekends, AI arguments, and random campus debates all have a way of turning into somebody trying to win instead of actually talking.

I am building a browser site called RageBate. You choose a topic and a side, match with the opposite take, and debate by text or video. The site tracks who is talking more and when the conversation starts getting rude, condescending, or toxic.

I want to test a GT room with topics people here would actually argue about. Not just boring campus surveys, but stuff that would get real disagreement going.

The rough version is here:

[https://thinklavender.com/ragebait](https://thinklavender.com/ragebait)

What Georgia Tech card would you add first?

Messi or Ronaldo, is Trump a fascist, can you be good without God, should everyone be vegan, immigration, dating politics, AI in coursework, startup culture, internships, or something else that has already destroyed at least one group chat?

I have been testing a debate site and Georgia Tech feels like the perfect stress test