After I posted screenshots of Cyberpunk benchmarking earlier from my new Claw 8 EX against my old Rog Ally X (non-XBox), some people asked about older games that weren't optimized for FSR / XeSS, and I agreed to run benchmarks on Red Dead Redemption 2 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. The Red Dead Redemption 2 benchmark doesn't show any information other than average, minimum, and maximum FPS during the benchmark; the Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark provides more detailed information.

Everythign was run on both systems at 1080p, 30w power draw, plugged in. Red Dead Redemption 2 was run at the default settings (which are somehow "Ultra"); Shadow of the Tomb Raider was run in DirextX 12 at "Lowest" settings.

Red Dead Redemption 2:  
ROG Ally X: Average FPS 36.8421; Maximum FPS 75.7679; Minimum FPS 7.69104  
Claw 8 EX: Average FPS 68.4757; Maximum FPS 102.184; Minimum FPS 27.646  
So the average FPS on the Claw 8 EX is 86% higher.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider:  
Rog Ally X: Average FPS 60  
Claw 8 EX: Average FPS 101  
So the average FPS on the Claw 8 EX is 68% higher.

Looking at the benchmark results for the Claw 8 EX in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, I had a feeling that the results were CPU limited, since it showed CPU usage flat across the entire benchmark. I re-ran the benchmark at "Highest" settings, and, sure enough, that reflected variable CPU usage and an average of 72 fps.

In any event, it shows that in pure rendering power, without AI trickery, the Arc G3 Extreme is a MASSIVE uplift over the Ryzen Z1 Extreme in the Ally X. I don't have a system with a Z2 Extreme to compare anything against, but my understanding is that it's only a slight improvement over the Z1 Extreme, so results should be largely similar.

Claw 8 EX Show Massive Performance Advantage Over ROG Ally X In Older Games Without Upscaling and Frame Generation