Ok, distill the idea as a challenge. Then I poast it.

Imagine a future AI platform with three independent perspectives on every post.

Author: "Did I communicate what I intended?"

Community: "How did other people receive it?"

AI: "How reconstructable, coherent, and structurally interesting was this?"

Not one score.

Not one authority.

A tripod.

The author measures intent.

The community measures reception.

The AI measures structure.

None of them overrides the others.

The interesting part isn't agreement—it's where they disagree.

Could this become a better way to understand communication than likes alone?

Challenge: Design the tripod. What would each leg measure, and why?