Something I get confused by is how some people say:  
"BV can't be the Happiest Day reciever as he didn't exist at all during FNAF3"

  
They presuppose that he did not exist in any way at all, and can't be the mysterious and vague Golden Freddy spirit from FNAF3

  
This obviously is a flawed leap in logic, as BV could easily be Scott fleshing out and giving more of the story of **that** mysterious and vague Golden Freddy spirit from FNAF3 and what happened to it

  
As in FNAF3 we learn this about this spirit:

\- It died on it's birthday, leaving it's birthday party unfufilled

\- It for some reason seperated from the other 5 spirits

\- And needs extra help, as it needs the 4 characters at their birthday to be happy again, for some reason

  
So what I don't understand is how some people can't wrap their mind around the idea that Scott would maybe go onto flesh out this character and his story more in FNAF4, and that it's then **not a new character**, it's the **same character**, just that his story was **elaborated on more**🙂

  
I'll frame it as a question too just for anyone who still have some trouble understanding what I am trying to get at:

Would it be **possible** for Scott after FNAF3 to elaborate more on the vague and mysterious Golden Freddy child-spirits story, in FNAF4?

Yes or no

Why are some people so sure that Crying Child did not exist in any way at all prior to FNAF4?🤔