Local-first + hosted fallback: looking for feedback on an OpenAI-compatible gateway

R

Hi everyone,

Disclosure: I built Codjz Gateway, so this is self-promo. I want to be upfront about that.

I know many people here prefer local-first LLM workflows. I’m interested in the same idea, but I kept running into one practical case: sometimes the local model is good enough, and sometimes I need a hosted fallback for testing, image routes, long context, or app workflows.

So I built a small OpenAI-compatible API gateway:

- OpenAI SDK compatible /v1 endpoint

- chat and image routes

- transparent route pricing before usage

- usage logs

- small test credit for new accounts

- works with Dify, Open WebUI, n8n, and custom apps

The goal is not to replace local models. It is more for hybrid workflows:

local model first, hosted route only when needed.

I’d love feedback from local LLM users:

  1. Would this be useful as a fallback endpoint?

  2. What integrations would matter most: LiteLLM, Open WebUI, Dify, oobabooga, KoboldAI?

  3. What would make you trust or distrust an API gateway?

  4. Do you care more about price, latency, privacy, model choice, or billing control?

Site: https://codjz.com

New users get $3 free API credit for testing real requests, but I’m mainly looking for product feedback from people who actually build with LLMs.

https://preview.redd.it/ljt9grcfzs9h1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=f23e2ade5d062189bfa8e0cd696bef36b9ddc089

Posted Jun 27, 2026, 10:33 AM UTC

10
Loading comments…