Better experience than mainstream chemicals?
Currently studying the effects of psychedelics and how context sets the experience, but I've only found people talking about classic and non-classic psychedelics.
So I was curious if anyone had their most profound or frightening experience on lesser known research chemicals.
Are there any that you would want to advocate for over the more mainstream substances? Perhaps a cautionary tale for why the mainstream are the most commonly used for a reason?
Please share your thoughts!
We're interested in things like:
- How intention, environment, and social setting shape psychedelic experiences
- Differences between clinical and non-clinical use
- How these experiences relate to psychological outcomes
Fully anonymous
Takes around 15-20 minutes to complete
There's also an optional follow-up interview if you'd like to share your experience in more depth
Full study details and ethics information are provided in the info sheet at the start of the survey
Requirements: 18+, have had a psychedelic experience in a clinical or non-clinical setting
If you have anything you feel is important to say about psychedelics, this is your chance!
I'm happy to answer any questions about the study. You can reach us at:
Warren - plks55@durham.ac.uk
Dr Marco Bocchio - Marco.Bocchio@durham.ac.uk
This survey has been approved by the moderators
Posted Jul 6, 2026, 1:23 PM UTC