[M4F] Envenomation is not insemination so why is it still kind of hot?

This is a pretty abstract one.

So ideally, if a man and woman are having unprotected sex, they're on board for the possible outcome. But if he ejaculates inside her, that semen doesn't know anything about bodily autonomy or consent. It's just a substance that has an effect on her body, and once it's inside her, its effects just... happen. It's a physical process, like a ball rolling down a hill.

"Envenomation" is the technical term for "the injection of venom". It's what happens when a bee stings you defending its nest. It's what happens when a rattlesnake bites a mouse and when a wasp paralyzes a spider.

Venomous animals have substances inside them that they have to somehow get inside a different creature to get it to do what they need it to do--to go away, to stop moving, to die. When the venom gets inside its victim, it causes changes to the victim's body that the victim can't do anything about. When the bee stings you, it's going to hurt. You can't unsting yourself. When the wasp stings the spider, the spider stops moving. It doesn't want to stop moving, but that doesn't matter. The venom is in its body. The change happens as a result of inevitable physical processes. Like a ball rolling down a hill.

This is kind of hot, right? So many living creatures are built around putting substances they make in their bodies into other bodies in order to forcibly change them. There are so many variations on the instinct of "I need your body to do something for me, and I will put something inside of it to force that change."

If this is hot to you, I would love to have a conversation about it.