I'm asking this because, I don't think any of the "Angel harassed Husk and didn't apologize" thing is intended. Now look, I don't think Viv or the writers in general wanted to show what was happening between Husk and Angel in the start of season one was meant to be shown as harassment. When they talked about it in episode 4, Husk said that he'd "Treat Angel better if he was real", and he called Angel fake over and over again. Husk had a problem with Angel's flirting not being genuine, and in Love In A Bottle we see that Husk himself is a flirty person. And he, or anyone else in the show never said anything about Angel harassing him. Because, like I think, it wasn't meant to be shown as harassment. 

First of all, I'm definitely NOT saying this to make Angel sound pure or innocent or saying that what he did isn't wrong. What he did IS wrong and even if Husk's problem wasn't with the flirting, he did look uncomfortable. And Angel needed to GET THE FUCK AWAY. 

The writers probably didn't make Angel apologize because they didn't mean for the problem to seem as something more than Husk getting annoyed that Angel is too fake, other than that? I personally think they would've made him apologize.

Still, I repeat that I'm NOT saying this to imply that Angel did nothing wrong. I actually would prefer him actually being a harasser at first and then becoming a better person when offered help, because THIS is a really good character development.

This is just my personal opinion, feel free to share yours if you disagree.

Genuinely asking, would Viv REALLY make Angel harasse Husk and then just make them become friends without making Angel apologize?