How do intraoral sensors actually compare to phosphor plates (PSP) in terms of image quality and radiation dose?

I've been curious about how intraoral sensors really stack up against phosphor plates once you look past the marketing claims. From what I understand, sensors tend to give you a slightly sharper image straight away since there's no separate scanning step, and they generally need a bit less radiation to produce a diagnostic-quality picture. Phosphor plates seem to hold their own on image quality too, and their thinner, more flexible form can make positioning easier in tight mouths, though you lose a little time waiting for the plate to be scanned. I'd love to know if the dose difference is actually significant enough to change protocol, or if it's more of a marginal edge in practice.