At what point does "work trip" stop explaining leaving the kids behind?
Curiosity got the better of me, so I skimmed a few home vlogs.
Jenn said the boys couldn't attend Disneyland Paris because the "event" wasn't for their age... huh? What event? What age limit?
I understand it was a hosted trip and maybe the company didn't want to pay for the kids. But Tim could buy a designer Disney Gucci cardigan, yet they couldn't pay to bring their own children or extend the trip so they could come too?
Then there was the trip to New York for a Pokémon event, and once again the children were left behind, despite them being into Pokémon for years.
I thought maybe I was being too harsh. As a parent, I understand that the idea of having children and the reality of parenting can be overwhelming for some people. But at this point, I just find it sad.
Those children seem good enough to feature in home vlogs, but not good enough to travel the world with their parents. they wouldn't have to film the boys either, Plenty of family creators now travel with their children while keeping them completely offline by simply not showing their faces.
Posted Jul 11, 2026, 1:38 PM UTC