Why aren't coaching institutes like Allen held accountable for student outcomes despite charging huge fees?

Coaching institutes like Allen charge very high fees and advertise impressive success rates. However, when students don't achieve the expected results or experience severe academic stress, the institute usually says that success depends entirely on the student's effort.

If these institutes market themselves as the key to success and earn crores from students, shouldn't they also share some responsibility for the quality of teaching, mentoring, and student well-being?

I'm not saying coaching institutes should guarantee selection—no one can do that. But should there be greater accountability for the promises made, the support provided, and the overall learning environment?

What do you think? Should there be stronger regulations for large coaching institutes, or is the current system fair?