He Admits That He Did Not Read the Refutation
--( بسم الله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله )--
abul_miswar_zayd openly admitted:
"Allaah is my witness that I haven't read this post of cn3m. Not even most of it. Not even a small bit of it."
This admission destroys his claim that "there is nothing to refute" in what I wrote. A person cannot honestly judge that there is nothing to refute in a post that he admits he did not read, not even a small portion of it.
Rather than addressing the quotations, translations, historical corrections, or scholarly principles presented in my response, he devoted an entire post and five comments to attacking a completely different person who merely observed that he had resorted to childish insults. He then searched through unrelated posts of mine and posted screenshots concerning DuckDuckGo, artificial intelligence, "cosmology", imam Abu Haneefah, Muhammad ibn Shams, and other subjects that have no connection to the original dispute.
This is another diversion from the evidence. None of those screenshots answers my clarification of ibn al-Qayyim, ibn Taymiyyah, Sahnoon, general and individual takfeer, or the methodology of justice in scholarly criticism. He has instead confirmed that he is willing to spend considerable time investigating unrelated material, composing personal attacks, and responding to bystanders, while refusing to read the actual refutation directed at him.
His own words therefore establish the matter clearly: he did not read the post, yet declared it unworthy of refutation; he did not answer its evidence, yet produced numerous comments attacking its author and anyone who criticized his conduct. This is not a scholarly response. It is an attempt to evade the substance by multiplying distractions.
He has still not responded to:
Instead, he has supplied further evidence for its title.
Posted Jul 16, 2026, 9:20 AM UTC