The Soo-Einsteinian Paradox

I wanted to share a philosophical paradox I’ve been developing regarding the intersection of physics, psychology, and the scientific method.

The Sue-Einsteinian Paradox states that the validity of physical time cannot be scientifically proven without a conscious mind to observe it. Because science requires consciousness to validate any measurement, time and the mind exist in an inseparable, infinite loop. Therefore, to question the objective reality of consciousness automatically nullifies the objective reality of time itself.

If psychology and psychiatry admit they have no objective proof of how consciousness works, how can physics claim 100% objective validity for its measurements of time when a conscious observer is required to read the clock?

I'd love to hear your thoughts, critiques, or counterarguments from an epistemological or physics perspective

Posted Jul 25, 2026, 11:39 PM UTC

016
Loading comments…