**A team with 7 openers (for the season, they have been chosen) getting 16-0 :-(**

Hi Game Moderator,

I know we've discussed this before, but here are a few observations from the last few days that I think can significantly improve the game:  
  
Each player-season combination should have a defined role (batting position for batsmen, Powerplay/Middle/Death overs for bowlers). If a player is used out of position, apply a multiplier below 1. For example, Yashasvi Jaiswal batting at No. 4 could have a 0.6–0.7 multiplier, so his 600-run season would count as only 360–420 runs.  
  
Currently, the game is largely about accumulating 4,500+ runs and 100+ wickets. Strike rate and economy have very little impact, which reduces strategic depth. Hardcore players would appreciate a more balanced scoring system. At the end of the day Hardcore players make a game a success or a failure. Ideally Strikerate and ER can also have multipliers. Like 600 runs with 120SR is as good as 400 Runs. 

Also, there is no weightage on the Season where the runs were scored. 500 runs scored in 2008-2010 are as good as 600 runs today. But we will hardly see a 16-0 teams with good representation from 2008-2015. As 700+ seasons become way too common after that. 

Lastly, there should be a way to see the teams that have made it to the leaderboard. Like currently I can't see the team that has earned 112+ and is at 1st position in the all-time leaderboard. Kills all the fun. 

Immortality, signed. 16-0. · Play 16-0