I spent years working with research-backed content, so I built an AI writer that rejects unsupported claims

I’ve spent more than a decade working in market research, consumer insights, and strategy. In that world, you cannot simply insert a plausible-sounding statistic into an article and hope nobody notices. Claims need evidence, sources matter, and knowledgeable readers can spot generic content almost immediately.

That became my biggest frustration with AI writing tools.

They could produce something fluent in seconds—but I would then spend an hour checking the facts, removing invented statistics, replacing generic language, and trying to make the article sound like it had an actual point of view.

So I built ContentIQ.

Instead of writing first and leaving the fact-checking to you, ContentIQ:

• Searches for relevant sources before drafting
• Tests claims against those sources
• Removes claims it cannot support
• Shows you what was verified and what was filtered out
• Writes using your brand voice, audience, positioning, and proof points
• Produces posts, blogs, in-depth articles, case studies, and white papers
• Lets you edit the article directly and export it to Word, PDF, or text

I also added a banned-phrase system to catch some of the usual AI language—“leverage,” “unlock,” “game-changing,” “seamless,” and the rest of the corporate soup.

The goal is not to generate more content. The internet already has enough content.

The goal is to help founders, marketers, consultants, and agencies produce articles that make a specific argument, use real evidence, and are credible enough to publish under their own names.

You can try your first article free here—no credit card:

https://app.contentiq.net

I’m still improving the product and would genuinely appreciate blunt feedback, particularly on:

1. Did the generated article feel specific or still too AI-like?
2. Did you trust the facts and sources?
3. Was creating the brand profile straightforward?
4. What would prevent you from using it regularly?
5. Is this something you would pay $39 a month for?

Please feel free to reply here so others can join the discussion, or email me directly at riddhi@thinkspire.tech with feedback, problems, or feature suggestions.

I would rather hear that something is confusing or unnecessary now than build the wrong product for another six months.