Speaking of parasitic people, I'm going to post something I saw on another forum. It's a comment from u/Final_Performermance (shared here with her explicit permission), who noticed how, lately, bots paid by Shivon Zilis are trying to spread the false image that she's Musk's ex, when, well, u/Final_Performermance explains it perfectly, and we've explained it perfectly on many occasions.

Shivon Zilis has never had anything to do with Musk, and the whole charade of the OpenAI trial and everything else was so that she could be neutralized legally. Ultimately, the insistence on selling us the narrative of a 'romantic relationship' or 'ex-partner' isn't accidental: within the US legal strategy, framing their connection as personal neutralizes her weight as an impartial witness, let's say....in general.

If you add to this the obvious contradictions between their testimonies regarding the organization's non-profit status and the email records that prove otherwise, their credibility in court is completely compromised. What we see on social media is nothing more than a desperate attempt to maintain a narrative of influence that has already been dismantled in court by documentary evidence. Although she also believes it helps the world forget that she failed to fulfill her fiduciary duties, in addition to a bunch of, let's call them, "anomalies" to avoid saying a more criminal word.

Personally, I don't believe there was anything intimate or sexual between Musk and either ASC or Zilis. In ASC's case, because she only met Musk once, so telepathy could have given rise to her claims. In Zilis's case, for the obvious reasons we know, plus her personal preferences, plus the fact that Musk doesn't even glance at her as a "woman."

Here is the comment by u/Final_Performermance: