If you regularly eat meat, why do you find Beastiality immoral?

Usually people say Beastiality is immoral because animals can’t consent to sex. however people who consume meat support an institution that regularly murders millions upon millions of animals, who never consented to be murdered, and never even had the capacity to consent for this. So why do you value animals consent when it comes to sex, but not when it comes to murder?

It also can’t be because of the common “you need to eat them to live, you don’t need to fuck them to live”. If we need to eat animals to live, why are vegans and vegetarians so common? Shouldn’t they all be dead? Mahatma Gandhi never ate meat but he didn’t die from starvation, he was shot by a bullet. How did he live for such a long time if he needed to eat meat to live? was he doing it in secret?

Then the third most common is, it’s immoral because it’s sexually degenerate. which is subjective and therefore irrelevant. a subjective human value like degeneracy has no bearing on morality. In the vast majority of the world people view lgbt+ people as sexually degenerate, does that make being gay immoral? So if the majority of people in the world viewing queerness as degenerate doesn’t mean it’s immoral, then why does the majority of the world viewing beastality as degenerate make it immoral?

can anyone give me a solid logically sound reason as to why a person who regularly consumes meat could reasonably called beastiality immoral, since they don’t find consuming meat immoral?

Posted Aug 14, 2026, 10:18 PM UTC

0393
Loading comments…