What do y’all think about the Clancy Case? Do y’all think that if she’s found not guilty that it sets up a precedent to be used to strip women’s rights under certain circumstances? Been seeing a lot of rhetoric regarding that.

I’ve been seeing a lot of rhetoric with this case online being used to strip women’s rights because if they are hormonal and “dangerous” they can’t be in position of power or make decisions for themselves. I’ve also have seen a lot of repeal the 19th rhetoric too. I’m not sure what precedents this could set considering how people are, and the political climate, I mean sure anything that’s going to happen is going to probably happen regardless of the case, however, I’m not really understanding the uptick in rhetoric like this considering familicide and filicide have been done many times before by both men and women. Why do people suddenly have their pants in a twist now? My personal opinion however, I don’t think that anything excuses killing the kids and I feel like a lot of people arguing do not actually care about the lives lost but if they can get gotchas on both opposing sides, and i understand there’s nuances with the case, that’s particularly true with most cases in general it’s not all black and white, but the general public does not fully know how to understand evidence that is presented to them and I’ve seen quite a bit of takes on both sides that are definitely something.

Posted Sep 1, 2026, 4:39 PM UTC

040
Loading comments…