

**Pata Hai Aaj Kya Hua — need an unbiased opinion.**

A couple had a clear boundary about one guy who had been hitting on the girlfriend. They mutually agreed she wouldn't talk, message, call, or meet him, and knowingly crossing this boundary would be considered cheating.

She had followed this boundary for around **a year**.

Recently, she went home for Rakhi, so their conversations became less frequent. The boyfriend also had exams and wasn't always available.

During an argument about the lack of attention, she said:

>

She then actually contacted him and also approached him and talked to him in her college class.

According to her, the reason was basically to **satisfy her ego and prove that even if her boyfriend doesn't give her attention, she can get that attention from someone else.**

The boyfriend felt this was deliberately crossing a boundary they had respected for a year, specifically to make a point during an argument. He ended the relationship.

So what do you think?

**Was ending the relationship justified?**

Does saying *“I warned you”* make it okay when the original boundary was never mutually changed?

Would you call this **cheating, betrayal, or a serious but fixable boundary violation?**

Please judge both sides honestly.

“If you don’t give me attention, I’ll get it from him.” — Dealbreaker?