[For Hire] I’ll Verify Whether Your AI Coding Agent Actually Finished the Job — $25 Trial / $50 Standard

[For Hire] I’ll check whether your AI coding workflow actually did what it says — $25 trial / $50 standard

I’m building MissionaryX, a project focused on making AI-assisted work easier to verify.

I’m offering a small Reliability Check for developers already using tools like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or other coding agents.

The problem I’m looking for is simple: an agent says the task is done, tests may even pass, but something was skipped, changed unexpectedly, left uncommitted, failed during a handoff, or cannot actually be proven from the repo state.

$25 fixed one-time trial:
One focused AI coding run / task, capped at about one hour. I check the request, resulting changes, tests, git state, and available evidence. You get a short written report explaining what I could verify, anything suspicious I found, and what I could not prove.

$50 fixed standard check:
Up to about two focused hours on one workflow or repo slice. I trace the task from request → agent work → tests → repository state → failure/recovery evidence and give you a clearer reliability report with specific findings and recommendations.

If the scope is larger, I’ll tell you before doing extra work and we can agree on a price. No subscription required.

I’m not claiming I’ll find a bug every time. A valid result can also be “I checked the evidence and did not find a material reliability problem.”

Good fit:
People already using AI coding agents who want an independent second look at whether a task really completed correctly.

Not included:
Full codebase development, penetration testing/security certification, production deployment, or guarantees that software is bug-free.

Portfolio / project:
[PASTE YOUR PUBLIC MISSIONARYX / GITHUB LINK HERE]

DM me with:
the AI coding tool you use, what happened, and the one task/result you most want independently checked.