Advisor said pick my own topic. 3 weeks of reading later I'm more lost

First year STEM PhD here. My advisor's approach is basically “go find your own direction,” which sounded great until I actually had to do it.

I've spent the last few weeks reading papers in my general area. I can understand the methods and summarize what each paper contributes, but the second I try to zoom out and ask what's actually missing, my brain just goes blank. I've read 40-something papers and somehow feel less sure than when I started.

So far I've tried citation chaining, review papers, talking to senior PhDs, and messing around with a few AI research tools. I tried mira ai science on a batch of abstracts too, mostly to see if it would surface connections I hadn't noticed. It did point out a couple interesting threads, but I'm definitely not treating any of that as ground truth.

The advice I keep getting is that you eventually “develop a feel for the field,” which is probably true but not especially helpful when you're starting from zero. Does this actually click at some point? How did you find your topic?

Posted Sep 5, 2026, 3:52 PM UTC

07
Loading comments…