DMT: "trans-gender" ideology is false.
“Trans-genders” are males who deliberately imitate females, seeking to deceive others into thinking they are female.
To deny that they are imitating females is logically impossible, evident by the fact that they undergo surgeries to castrate themselves and carve wound holes into their bodies to resemble female genitals, put plastic implants into their bodies to resemble breasts and get surgery on their faces to resemble a female facial structure.
Thus these are males (dressing up as/imitating/mimicking/pretending to be) females. No reasonable person can deny that carving a fake vagina into your body is imitating female anatomy.
And to deny that they seek to deceive others into thinking they are female is contradicted by their own admission that they want to “pass” a reference to not being able to be spotted as male and making others think you are female.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passing_(gender): In the context of gender, passing is someone being perceived as a gender they identify as or are attempting to be seen as, rather than their sex assigned at birth.
Although here they are using “sex vs gender” mental gymnastics the “rather than their sex assigned at birth” is enough to show that this means they do not want to be perceived as male, which they are. And thus as female, which they are not.
And no, none of the ideological redefinitions they made up solve this, including a “sex vs. gender” distinction. These concepts do not even make sense; they just redefined “woman” and “gender” to random stuff they made up, which has nothing to do with the original definition, so that them “being women” with this new irrelevant definition lets them be called the same syllables as the original definition which they wish they were.
You can make identical redefinitions for anything, “species,” “age,” and so on. You can divide “species” into “biological species” and “social species” like they did for “sex and gender” and say that all words related to species are now about the new “social species” definition rather than the biological one, so people can call themselves “trans-dogs.” So they can go to the streets and shout “trans dogs are dogs.”
“Trans-gender,” isn’t any more reasonable than the others.
Posted Sep 6, 2026, 3:15 AM UTC