So this is something Chris's done retrospective episodes on Mike & Jeff sokil, and while I can understand Sokil, dragging manzi's name again for views is shitty behaviour.

# "But he's a predator, who cares"

He wasn't charged with anything to put him on the sex offenders registry nor any sexual crimes. It's still bad he showed up but to drag his name again is shitty behaviour.

Not to mention manzi's already suffered enough, he lost his job as a tutor, he's got a criminal record, the original sting has millions of views on YouTube & he's been insulted by the scumbags on this sub.

# "How is Chris bad for doing this"

Because he's simply doing it for the views, thsts literally the only reason why, if he wanted to revisit manzi's case why not do it on the podcast like he already did, ahy not try intivew manzi if he was open to it, get his side of the story of his life at the time.

But instead he drags his nane in the mud again, implies stuff, calls him a predator when he's legally not and biasedly reports on the case. He could get sued for this, not to mention his credibility as a journalist questioned.

# This also doesn't excuse what he did.

I'm making this clear as day since I got accused of pedophilia and sympathising on my last post, but pedophilia is wrong, manzi going to smoke weed with a 13 year old is wrong, even when he wasn't going to do anything and was truly concerned. It doesn't mean he or the predators Chris catches aren't people.

I never thought i'd have to make that clear but ohwell lol

Is shitting on Manzi again nesscary?