Why don't employees and concerned citizens alternate emergency no-contact orders against anti-union managers and executives til they're replaced with law-abiding people?
It doesn't add up. When a manager does illegal anti union meetings and lies about performance evaluation metrics, that's plausible enough grounds to report generic harassing behavior that a judge will rubber-stamp the no contact order, especially if the person filing is female and the manager is male.
It feels like most pro-union folks opposed by corporate literally don't really care enough about unions to mechanistically set up a successful union within parameters of budget and US law.
Posted Sep 25, 2026, 5:17 PM UTC
018