why does nobody do this for learning/abstraction/novel reuse?

Ive taken this and asked every llm and stupid computer i know, and all they keep saying is because its not tested, but i tested it, then its because its not tested big enough, and the bar doesnt end. I try coming at it 100 different ways to find the lichpin but there is nothing that the llms can reason because its likely so dumb that nobody has written about it elsewhere. so I know its wrong, i know its probably nonsense, but ffs i cant figure out why.

now i cant paste any llm generated "theories" but i dont know how to transcribe the field equasions myself, so ought i just kick rocks and get a math degree? very fair, i would be annoyed with the llm trash too, i get it, but they raised a question i cannot answer and cannot ask anyone else because they raised it and nobody wants to deal with them...

can a field equasion not be used to iterate over its own structure to make more structure, using the residual from what patterns it abstracts to form nodes that connect to others, subtracting their effect from the field and then acting recursively. its one object in recursion, and its easily testible and it works, but nobody does it, clearly because i dont understand something but the thats exactly why im trying to ask questions to understand.

hey, my apologies, you're all tired of this crap, and im sorry to be contributing to it tangentially. im not arrogant nor do i think im right, but if the worst things these llms to is generate questions and curiosity to find answers, please take that as a silver lining.

nothing here was generated by an llm or ai. if even mentioning them warrants deletion idk how i could know that otherwise.