Does something only qualify as a "problem" if someone is affected by it?

​Can something truly be considered a "problem" if nobody is bothered, hurt, or negatively affected by it? I've been thinking about whether a problem strictly requires an affected conscious mind, or if an action or event can be problematic entirely on its own.

​For instance, imagine someone screams at the top of their lungs in the middle of a quiet neighborhood at midnight. The neighbors hear it clearly, but nobody feels annoyed, upset, or disrupted in any way. Does that act still count as a problem by itself, or does it only become a problem if someone is genuinely bothered by it? or imagine a completely dead planet with no life. If an asteroid destroys it or an automated machine there breaks down, is that an actual problem, or merely a neutral physical occurrence that means nothing until a conscious observer evaluates it?

​How do philosophers usually look at this, is a "problem" always dependent on an affected mind, or can something be an objective problem purely on its own?