&#x200B;

So the same day I picked up the new Swiitch I also grabbed a 1g jar of Terps N Caicos. This one's a pale cream color with a very funky almost cheesy aroma. Not gassy at all, and no real herbal notes either. Super firm concentrate, if you're into rolling your own hash holes this would be GREAT for it!

Effects-wise it sits right in the middle. No couchlock pulling you into the chair, but no creative or energetic boost either. Just an extremely pleasant high that kept me functional. The terpene profile explains it: limonene and caryophyllene running nearly equal, with linalool presence to keep anything from tipping sativa.

What surprised me was the stability. I left a scoop out of the fridge for a few days and the texture stayed firm, terps didn't sweat out at all, and the flavor didn't fall off. Still, I would recommend keeping it chilled and properly come to room temperature before opening the jar for the best experience. 

In the PuffCo, most concentrates I smoke need qtipping after the second cycle. This one consistently went three cycles, and I was extending the cycles too on top of it. The flavor stayed clean through cycle three even though the oil had gotten dark and mostly boiled off. I stopped there instead of pushing a fourth because I wasn't going to risk it getting harsh, but the longevity was genuinely impressive. This is pushing what I've come to expect from my rosin pickups at this point.

The [COA](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xaYFWorcdPWVkX-6HBX8h-UiTpc0lVox/view?usp=drivesdk) looks great. 74.58% THC, basically no CBD at 0.1554%, which tracks with the lack of sedation. 5.6% terps means it's not volatile enough to fall apart as observed by my room temperature testing. Everything passed: residuals, pesticides, heavy metals, microbials all clean.

One thing that stood out: the cover page lists 06/26/2026 as the harvest date even though one of the source strains came in 7/6/2026. They used the older date. Most brands would flip that and list the fresher one. That's the kind of detail that matters, and puts a bit of a nail in a misconception I've seen thrown around that the most recent number *has* to be the one used. The only restrictions that I'm aware of is that only *one* *date* can be listed. Most brands opt to list what looks the most appealing, I think this is the first instance I've seen (or at least noticed) where they've opted to list the most transparent option.

I've seen a few people ask how someone could commit to 5g of one strain without burning out on it, but I could absolutely see myself getting some of their 5g/99 jars. A few strains that I was looking for was only available in 5g and I'm already considering just taking a chance based on this jar.

Copperstate - Terps and Caicos...God DAMN