Source
hapaxLegomina•

Request: use non-editorialized title for articles, in this case "ULA launch delayed" would have been more appropriate (rule 6). In any event, this article is not about SPX (rule 7).

3
Rxke2•

I hope I'm not the only one around here who feels uneasy cheering a launch scrub of an important sat. I know the story behind this jab, and am a trueblood Mars fanatic/hence spacex cheerboy, but, c'mon guys n gals, this just feels petty.

2
Space_voidOP•

I was not cheering a launch scrub. I was just pointing out the every one can have problems in light off the ULA push back on SpaceX. But seams that the Mods also thought that i was out of line and I apologize for that.

2
Rxke2•

I was already wondering where that post was... To be clear: I (as a former admin on several space related BB's) do not like posts being removed, I'm only kind of sad about the current 'bickerish' atmosphere (and, to be sure, Musk is partly to blame for that... Because he is -understandably- frustrated about certain stuff...

But spaaaaaace! Why can't we all band together on this grand endeavor, sigh.

1
AmbiwlansMOD•

Lets try to curb the negative posts. It is a pro SpaceX sub not anti-ULA. Sometimes these two things are one and the same when it comes to the legal battle with the USAF but we don't need more than that. Removed as per 6/7 like hapaxLegomina stated.

2