After over 7 years on Wikipedia, the Cultural Marxism article was deleted

It's there now

Yeah noticed that earlier. After the first deletion it redirected to an article by that title. It now appears that both Cultural Marxism and Frankfurt School Conspiracy Theory articles were deleted and merged into the already existing Frankfurt School article, which was then hacked to pieces into somewhat resembling the Frankfurt School Conspiracy Theory article.

[deleted]

The fact that Black Kite was in position to contribute in the first place, is proof that these checks are not done as a matter of course, but instead, that recusals and removals only happen if someone notices a reason after the fact(nomination/inclusion).

The black kite issue would be equivalent to a judge being chosen to preside over his own son's case, getting into the courtroom, starting proceedings, and then someone saying heeeey wait a minute, that's your son! Judge Black Kite then shrugs and says "Oop, you got me, I'll step down."

That is not a system that regularly prevents bias. A system that prevents bias would be on that undoes prior decisions made on bias, and penalizes those involved that knowingly acted while a bias existed(in the example of courtrooms, this would be a mistrial voiding the verdict and accusations/penalties for the judge; THAT is the system that regularly prevents bias).

Furthermore, the system of "putting your hand up first" in response to the notification of controversial deletion does not prevent admins asking friends to the panel. All an admin has to do, after seeing the notice, is to contact a fellow admin and ask them to "put their hand up" for it. Obviously, the trend of bias in this has clear potential. If I believe in a specific social cause, and I feel a group admin action is relevant to my social cause, I would try to contact admins who are "on my side" to resolve the admin action (in a way I would consider) favorably.

TL;DR - Your post is bad and you should feel bad.

Everyone always loves to talk about how evil the Nazi's were with their genocide and warmongering.
But the fucking refusal to discuss the finer points of why they were evil is always seen as wrong somehow.

Because if they were just evil because of genocide and warmongering, there have tons of nations, organizations; both political and religious, and even individuals who've been guilty of that.

What was evil about the Nazi's was also the tragedy of it all, how ordinary people were convinced trough propaganda and censorship, group think and echo chambers that all their problems and flaws were someone else fault, another groups fault and that they were all superior or better and deserved better and more.
To convince ordinary people that these other people were both monsters who conspired and are responsible for all their misery yet somehow also less then human trash not worthy of pity.

Convincing all those ordinary, otherwise good people to help commit, cheer on or just passively allow the other heinous crimes against humanity to be committed.
That was the true evil of the Nazi's.

To do evil yourself is nothing special, everyone can lie, steal or commit murder, but to convince others that the evil you do is not just the right thing, not that even, to get others to commit those evil crimes for you convinced they are doing the right thing... that's true evil.

When I compare these identity, post-modernist driven movements to nazi's I'm not comparing them to the genocide and the war mongering.
Plenty of other historical movements and figures guilty of just that.
No, I'm comparing them to how the Nazi's convinced the ordinary people to do evil against innocents.

/rant

You know who else loves nazi comments?

^^^the ^^^nazis

Which is the stupidest system of selection possible and just as open to special interest supportive admins

Deletion request was put in over christmas holidays.

Gee, I wonder which admins would be paying attention during the holidays?