Salty editors create the "ArbitrationGate controversy" page as response to ArbCom statement on GG case
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArbitrationGate_controv...Posted Jan 27, 2015, 2:48 PM UTC
117
Posted Jan 27, 2015, 2:48 PM UTC
Actually it was started on 8chan as a result of Wikipedias double-think on the guardian as a reliable source even when it is Blatantly lying. It was more of a joke to bring the issue into the light.
Arbcom is really going to understand what we've been going through with the mud slinging now.
Aaaaaaaaaand it's gone.
The link you posted has been saved to archive.today in case it disappears for whatever reason or is modified.
You may access the saved link here:
This comment has been generated by a bot. All questions and bug reports should go to r/preserverbot.
The creator of this bot has no affiliation with archive.today whatsoever.
I am still in alpha, so there is bound to be a few bugs!
How the Hell can these people devote so much time and energy to something so useless?
I'm sure not having a real job has something to do with it.
[deleted]
Do you have a link/screencap of it on 8chan?
[deleted]
[deleted]