I have to exploit animals because of progress
I mean if I stopped exploiting them then that might mean I was working cooperatively with other animals to keep the world from turning into a burnt-out husk and since that's a moral thing to do I obviously can't do that. Because the system is amoral and so by being moral I am anti-human progress or something, I don't know, I confused myself.
Posted Feb 28, 2015, 9:48 PM UTC
97
Now look here, It's very clear. Before progress there was only a small amount of unnecessary suffering in the world and we have progressed to maximizing the amount of suffering in the world by exploiting as many animals as physically possible. In some cases we have progressed so much from consuming so many animals that we then have to exploit more animals for curing the ailments of consuming other animals.
So as you can see we are pro-human pro-gress animal exploiters. Hopefully you will get off your anti-gress stance and come to your senses.
Oh my god, you're right! All this time I should have been focused on MAXIMIZING suffering in the name of gress. Except, I don't know what a gress is. Is that like the quantification of depravity we incur every time we torture a kitten? How do you feel about just maximizing suffering without utilizing the being in question for some trivial purpose? Do you think I could better serve the cause by going out of my way to harm everything I possibly can?
Now you get it! Suffering without utilization is the most trivial of purposes.
As to helping the cause, yes! Go forth and harm it all it's the only vegan thing to do!