Cheeky James Hunt, after his win is taken away, due to his rear wing being too wide.
imgur.com/a/GEWjhPosted Aug 4, 2015, 5:44 AM UTC
Posted Aug 4, 2015, 5:44 AM UTC
They gave the win back to him later in the season right? Why? For what reason?
Mclaren broke the rules.
As I recall they measured the width when the tires were still hot and had expanded. The cad was within limits when it was cool. But I could be wrong...
What does that have to do with the rear wing? Sorry if I come off as a dick, im actually curious.
I thought that the car was disqualified on the basis that the overall width was too wide not the rear wing, in which case that's why the measurements during different temperatures would affect this. I may be wrong and it actually was the rear wing though
In the documentary that i got these images from it said that his wing was too wide, but on wikipedia it says, that his car was too wide, so I'm not sure which it is.
I'm quite sure it was the width of the car from wheel to wheel. And yes, he later got the win back.
Thank you for bringing this film to my attention!
What does that have to do with the rear wing?
OP is mistaken, it was not rear wing that was too wide, it was the car itself.
Oh, the humanity!
Hence 'vehicle' on the sign.
You're right.
What a cheeky hunt
This thread is what F1 should be about. Interpretation.
Absolutely fantastic.
I met his niece the other day.
Neat.
Just got done watching that part of Rush.
Lmao thats great. Wish some drivers would do the same to get a good laugh at the grid lol
This one should go on Maldonado's car, because you just know it's going to happen.
Lmao yes ! All though they might laugh too hard and get into another accident..😂👌
James should have a "CAUTION: LONG CAR" written on his boxer briefs.
Especially because what "car" means in Albania.
Relevant
They should put that on Maldonaldo's car
.... or in reverse on the front of the McLarens
Mclarens keep their distance regardless
from the article
they couldn't tell with all the twitter bants between teams and drivers?
It's not a current article
oh... well then..