Need some help from your perspective
I posted this to r/adoption last night but just found out about this sub-Reddit and thought I'd probably get a better response here.
I have an acquaintance who's a young single mother of two. She got pregnant at age 15 (she's now 21) and had to get out of the relationship when things got abusive. Up to this time she was a stay-at-home mom. 6 months ago she was raped and as a result has developed PTSD and severe anxiety. She realized she could not take care of the kids properly and sent them to live with the grandparents (parents of her ex) who live in another state.
She is now enrolled in school to get her Certified Nursing Aide license with a plan to continue her education for 3 more years. At the end of the three years she planned to get her kids back. She's a very hard worker and volunteers at a local hospital. They like her and have said they'd hire her once she gets certified in a couple more months. Then she planned on working there part-time while continuing her education at night.
She was very excited to have turned her life around and working hard with the single goal of getting the kids back but yesterday got word from the grandparents that they want to adopt the kids, take her name off the birth certificates and have no more contact until the kids are 18 years old. As far as I can tell their reasoning is that the boy, who's 5, gets very upset when she comes to visit and then has to leave or when she calls and has to hang up. We feel like it's a natural response for his age but that he'll get over it as he gets older. We also feel like it will be better for the kids in the long run to have contact and visitations but we're admittedly feeling this way based on emotions.
To be honest I have no idea what's best for the kids in the long run. I'm a 63 year old male with no kids but my gut says it's best for the kids if she remains in their lives as much as possible with the plan to take them back in a few years.
It really isn't a legal issue as she's known the grandparents since she was 12 years old and knows they're good people. They are comfortable financially and give the kids a good home so moving them elsewhere is not on the table. What we're looking for mainly are the real life experiences of adoptees to get a feel for what's best for kids in the long run and compelling reasons why. If the feeling here is that no contact is best, with reasons why, we'll listen to that and be more willing to let go. But we'd also like to hear from adoptees reasons why continued contact would be best, reasons that she could give to the grandparents that would make them change their minds.
TIA for any advice/help. And please feel free to ask questions. I'm out of my element here and surely leaving out some useful info.
Update: I talked to my friend and she did talk to the grandparents today. It turns out their reason for wanting to adopt and keep the kids was mainly because they don't think they could just give the 5-year-old boy up after having him for 3 years. So for now the decision has been made for the boy to return back home. I'm very much against this just because I know my friend isn't ready for the kid to come back home. She's going to school full-time and has a part-time minimum wage job. The only way she stays at all afloat is because I've given her over $15,000 to pay for her schooling, car payments, rent, insurance, gas, food, etc. and with a kid to take care of I know there's no way unless I really eat into my savings. I tried to talk her into having the grandparents keep the kid another 3 years like she planned but it doesn't look like they'll budge on that, although I've talked her into trying again. I don't know what else to do now. I'm not only worried about her future but mine as well since I'm in no way prepared to pay for the kid but there's no way I can just let them sink.
FINAL UPDATE: Thanks to everyone who replied. I kept my friend abreast of your ideas and leanings and it helped get to a final solution. The decision is for no adoption, the grandparents to keep the son for 2 years and then my friend will take custody. It's a year earlier than the original plan but it just means we'll have a very busy 2 years getting her solidly on her feet. She's an impressively hard worker and I have no doubt she'll be ready when her son gets here. And she has no restrictions on visits, although realistically she can only afford to go maybe twice a year. So things are looking up. Thank you all for your help and support. Reddit can be a truly wonderful place!
Posted Jan 25, 2016, 5:20 PM UTC · edited
So it's the parents of the abusive ex who are taking care of her children?
It sounds to me like they're incredibly biased against her, and I would not trust their opinion of "what's best" for the children. They're probably on their son's side, and who know what kinds of things he's said about her to his parents.
I'm an adoptee who is pro family preservation unless there's a compelling reason to split up a family (incest, abuse, rampant drug use, neglect, etc.).
It sounds to me like she's a caring and capable mother who loves her kids and is doing what's best. There's no reason to permanently separate her from her children.
I'd also be very concerned about the children having contact with the abusive ex. If he traumatized the mother, how is he behaving around the kids who are living with his parents?
I read through the thread in r/adoption, and agree with the commenter who recommended she get some kind of legal representation. This is a messy situation that's only going to get messier over the next three years.
I see nothing in your story that indicates she's a neglectful or unfit mother. The kids belong with her, especially if they've been in any kind of regular contact with the abusive ex.
Thank you for the reply. Yes, it's the parents of the ex who's taking care of the kids and they know their son is an ass. When a warrant was put on him for domestic violence (he pushed her through a window that cut her hand badly) he took off for Oregon and is in hiding from everyone, including his parents. There is very little chance of him coming in contact with the kids.
The mother is a very good person who made some bad teenage choices. Unfortunately she was raped and tazed 5 times which left her with some pretty severe PTSD with constant nightmares and anxiety that;s required hospitalization a couple of times. That's why she knows she can't care for the kids now but has a plan to take them back in 3 years.
I have no doubts she's a great mom and will be very responsible when she gets the kids back. We're just hoping the grandparents will remain foster parents until she's ready to take the kids back in a few years.
Although it may not seem like it, she needs to know that she has a lot more control in this situation than she may think. The grandparents cannot legally adopt the kids without her legal consent. She has to sign away her parental rights for any adoption to take place, and she has the legal right to decline to do so, no matter how coercive the grandparents may become.
Without knowing these kids myself, my experience as an adopted person tells me the 5 year old is probably crying because he's sad over the loss of his mother, no matter how temporary. Cutting off all contact until he's 18 will likely only make his sense of loss grow as he gets older.
I'm one of seven fully biological siblings who were separated and adopted into five different families. I grew up as an only child, but knew I had other siblings out there who I wasn't allowed to meet yet. As much as I looked forward to being able to meet them "someday," I felt really sad and lonely that I didn't have them with me while I was growing up.
I love my parents who adopted me; they're great people. But I missed my siblings terribly, even though I'd never met them. I can't imagine how I would have felt to spend the first 5 years of my life with them and then get separated for 13 years after that.
We did finally meet each other in college, and reunited with all seven of us together for the first time ever last June. I felt complete and like I could truly be myself with them.
A lot of people like to say that adoption gives kids a "better" life. In some cases, that's true. But in other cases, the term "better" is totally relative. Is it good for a kid to grow up in a financially stable home? Absolutely. Is it good for a kid to grow up in a less stable home, but with a devoted mother who loves him? Absolutely.
Is one option "better" than the other? That's a very complicated answer. My personal belief as an adoptee is that children always belong with their original families, unless there's abuse happening.