have some coming soon and wanted to know how other people liked it and if anyone had any negative experiences with it. have already read the whole 3 trip reports on this new substance and am looking for some more regular users opinions.
Posted Feb 3, 2016, 3:39 AM UTC
I enjoy 2'-Oxo-PCM (O-PCM, better named than DXE/DCK) a lot. I like it right up there with Ketamine and MXE. Not saying which one it better, but to me there are more similarities than differences. I like that it's not a sedating and debilitating as K and MXE. I can play music great on lower doses. I can hole it out, it's just a little different and I can move around. But mentally, it's pretty therapeutic for me. I don't do it daily though.
I loveeeeee it. I found that it had more euphoria than other dissos I had tried, and that the high had more versatility. It was terrible when I combined it with cannabis tho. I found that it has a tad of a "trip" feeling to it similar to acid (very light) that I did not find with MXE, K, or 3-MeO-PCP
I have, but if you read all the trip reports, you've already read mine. Feel free to ask me any questions about it though.
I don't like it, made me feel dumb and stupid. I have much higher hopes for 2-fluorodeschloroketamine when it becomes more readily available. And be sure to read up on the new health warning posted here recently about chronic usage, white blood cells, and AIDS symptoms...
That was some fear mongering bullshit, go back to the thread. He didn't have any solid sources.
I'm aware there's no studies on this extremely new drug... I don't need to go back to the thread, I read every reply already. I would obviously much rather someone be aware of issues that might exist than to not be aware and end up with health issues. But be my guest and say fuck it! Please let us know if you get AIDS symptoms or not and be our lab rat. I did not use it enough to be able to tell you.
I haven't done it and I don't plan to but what i'm saying is his super exaggerated post was relatively unfounded and stated as fact based on the opinion of a bluelight user. I am all for risk mitigation and harm reduction especially with newer unresearched compounds, but I have a strong dislike for random bits of information being touted as fact and spread through the internet, misleading people greatly which goes against the ideals behind harm reduction in the first place.
All of that aside it is still very important the exercise extreme caution if you choose to research these compounds.
I agree and I guess you're right that I shouldn't be spreading opinionated information instead of factual, but thought it should still be taken into consideration as a potential side effect. But I guess it shouldn't be a potential side effect if someone on Bluelight is merely speculating on what could happen with chronic use instead of what did happen with chronic use.
Okay that post was an extraordinarily unfortunate distraction to the fact that the antibiotic effects can be very damaging. I doubt you'll get aids, but antibiotics can be very dangerous for other reasons i posted underneath. That said, I doubt any arylcylclohexylamine is exempt from this