But will Congress do anything if Sanders is President?

Sanders has a lot of great ideas about how to take our country back for the 99%. I think we have gotten past the argument that he isn't electable and work continues to elect him. BUT! A main argument remaining is that he wouldn't be able to get any of his ideas made into law. With the current congressional demographics, it doesn't look likely that democratics will retake congress, even with a massive sweep of voting for a democratic presidential candidate.

  *Out of 435 House seats, 168 that republicans hold are either nominally contested( the dem competitor hasn't raised any money and is running against an incumbent), or are completely uncontested
*It looks even worse on http://www.270towin.com/2016-house-election/

  *For state legislatures, in 2014, in more than 33% of state races the election was uncontested....therefore voters did not have a choice. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/12/01/there-was-only-one-candidate-to-chose-from-in-more-than-a-third-of-all-state-legislative-races-this-year/

  I know the focus is on getting Sanders to win the nomination and then the presidency, but for things to be different than they were under Obama we need to win more than the presidency. Sanders has repeatedly said that he cannot do it alone, and that it will require a revolution by the voters.

  In many places it might be impossible or unlikely for a democratic to win, but what about an independent similar to how Bernie won as an independent running for congress. We seem to have a very strong ground game and with signatures can get independents on the ballot. Examples:

  South Carolina: No Contested Races! - 6 districts are R, 1 is D, Senator is R
Super Tuesday:
Alabama: 4 uncontested seats held by R's out of 7 total seats
Arkansas: 3 uncontested seats held by R's out of 4 total seats
Colorado: 2 uncontested seats held by R's out of 7 total seats
Georgia: 10 uncontested seats held by R's out of 14 total seats + Senate
Massachusetts: All dem, but none contested
Minnesota: 2 uncontested seats held by R's out of 8 total seats
North Dakota: 1 uncontested seats held by R's out of 1 total seats + Senate
Oklahoma: 5 uncontested seats held by R's out of 5 total seats + Senate
Tennessee: 7 uncontested seats held by R's out of 9 total seats
Texas: 13 uncontested seats held by R's out of 36 total seats
Vermont: Senate & rep are dem, uncontested
Virginia: 6 uncontested seats held by R's out of 11 total seats
Wyoming: 1 uncontested seats held by R's out of 1 total seats

  *Whether someone is liberal or conservative, not having a choice to vote should be infuriating in what is supposed to be the model democracy of the world.
*If we want anything Bernie is campaigning on to happen, we need to mobilize to change this, and continue through 2018.
*I think getting candidates on the ballot who would support Bernie, or at least not blockade legislation for 2 years should be folded into our grassroots organizing and activism. *In my opinion, this should be a campaign issue, especially in areas where citizen's don't have a choice!

Posted Feb 15, 2016, 8:20 AM UTC

913
notjustaboutbernieMichigan•

We are working on identifying and supporting candidates that would support Bernie at r/grassrootsselect Please join us!

11
DenProgOPColorado•

I am happy to help! I have read that republicans typically try to work candidates into local seats to develop them before running them for a national congressional office. That way they can build connections and credibility in their area as well as develop before running for a national office.
I think we can at least work on giving people a choice in their areas, help expose Bernie's message to more people, maybe get some people into seats, and have a ground game established for current and future local, state, and national congressional elections.

4
notjustaboutbernieMichigan•

Awesome. Over at r/grassrootsselect, there's a link in the sidebar to sign up as a volunteer.

2
DenProgOPColorado•

I just joined sent the volunteer form over, looking forward to helping.

4
firemage22Michigan•

I think the lack of contested seats is another example of DWS being bad at her job.

4
DenProgOPColorado•

Absolutely, on one hand resources are limited in how many candidates can be financially supported. But what message does it send to voters to basically be abandoned with no choice, even if it is someone with limited funding and support. Also, voters in these areas are not exposed to any progressive messaging, letting conservatives and tea partiers dominate the exchange of ideas. To me, it is an embarrassment that the requirements to run as a democrat generally are just filing the paperwork, but there are over 100 seats where that was too much of a hurdle for whoever is in charge. In many states it is now too late to run a democrat, leaving gathering signatures for an independent as the only option.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

3
DenProgOPColorado•

I think that Bernie is right about political leaders stepping out and advancing ideas and an argument to mobilize support and away undecideds. We are seeing the desperation of the establishment to prevent a lot of the agenda, even in the primaries from our own side.
I would expect the distortion of his policies to be even more extreme by conservatives and in many areas there are no opposing voices, leaving Bernie as a voice in the wilderness. Even in these red areas, there are probably about 30-40% of the population that already leans progressive, and more who can be swayed. Even though races are likely hopeless in most of these areas, it will help mobilize the progressives in these areas and begin to plants seeds in the mind of other voters.

1
DirtyBurger•

As opposed to the bang up job they are doing now?

3
DenProgOPColorado•

Exactly why they need to have some competition. They are all about competition right ;)

1
Aelle1209South Carolina•

Just a note, district 7 in South Carolina is now being contested by a democrat--one who just happens to be one of my former college professors: https://ballotpedia.org/South_Carolina's_7th_Congressional_District

3
DenProgOPColorado•

That is great!!!

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
MaculatePennsylvania - Bernie Squad - Private•

And more importantly, Bernie's proposals will be ones that we can trust whereas who knows what kind of shady shit Hillary will trying to put through. TPP, Keystone Pipeline, Many more wars, etc.

It's not just about whether congress will work with the candidate (and you are right that there is no chance in hell of the GOP working with Hillary), but what they are proposing. And it might not even be while Bernie is in office that he is successful, but we need a leader that can start taking us in that direction.

3