Conceptual issue with the "Stash" requirement
I have an issue with the requirement of having to have a stash. I understand that it is useful to track your stash and define how much you use / how much is left. However this implies two assumptions: You are only taking your own drugs and you never share your drugs.
In my opinion it would be better if the stash definition would be optional in case you want to track your stuff but not required to track a chemical.
Any thoughts?
Posted May 21, 2016, 12:10 AM UTC
21
I'll probably add the hability of adding any drug as an entry. And also have planned a stash adjustment feature for when you share or gift/sell/lose or just didn't input something.
So yes, both coming but I have really few time to work on it because of the baby and my real job. The only time I have free to program I have to dedicate it to billable hours. Sorry about the slow development.
I feel like I'm missing something here. How are you supposed to log purchases of substances you already have a stash of? Do you just edit the stash's amount (doesn't seem like an elegant solution) or do you create a second entry for the same substance (also seems a bit weird)?
I create a second entry with the new source since the stash probably has different quality and maybe dosages are different . If you are talking about the same vendor / batch. I'm planning on doing a "adjust stash" feature that allows you to buy more and also do things as "gifts" or selling and adjusting amounts. Work in progress.. Sorry. If I use a stash completely, I archive it and create a new one.
Ok, thank you =)
hehe, the specific purchase this came up with was caffeine pills from the pharmacy, so yeah, it should be roughly the same quality ^^