Cliffs Notes - Trial Transcript, Dec 10, 1999
December 10, 1999 Trial Transcript
-
Page 2-24 - Young Lee (Hae’s brother)
-
Page 7 – The cousin’s teacher calls the Lees at 3:30.
-
Page 13 – Young says that Adnan never called their house after 1/13
-
Page 17 – Young says the blood stained tee-shirt is his, and was not bloodstained last he knew
-
Page 25-36 Nisha Testimony
-
Page 31 – Nisha says her number doesn’t have an answering machine
-
Page 37 – 53 - Officer Adcock Testimony
-
Page 40 – Adcock gets Adnan’s cell and Aisha’s phone number from Young. Maybe it’s only these 2
-
Page 42 – Adcock describes the call with AS; AS says he asked Hae for a ride, Hae got tired of waiting and left
-
Page 43 – Adcock calls Don later that evening
-
Page 48 – Adcock says he knew AS & Hae to be friends
-
Page 54 – Hae’s mother is moved back in the room, because she might be distracting the jurors
-
Page 56-69 - Detective Forrester, Baltimore City Homicide Unit
-
Page 58 – Forrester follows Ritz, McGillivary, and Jay to Hae’s car
-
Page 60 – Forrester says the windshield wiper selector switch was broken
-
Page 65 – The detectives needed to take a video to show that the control arm was broken
-
Page 70-102 Sal Bianca, Baltimore City Police crime lab – trace analysis unit
-
Page 80 – The bloody shirt’s DNA was analyzed at the request of the detectives
-
Page 83 – Fibers found on and near the body were compared to a jacket, boots, and wrestling gloves
-
Page 84 – No semen was found
-
Page 85 – Epithelial cells found on the liquor bottle. DNA test not requested
-
Page 100 – Prosecutor Murphy objects to CG calling Urick an a$$#*|e
-
Page 101 – The judge says he’ll assume Murphy misheard CG, and he says CG is a pitbull, referencing dec 9th discussion with a juror, and the judge says CG is a courteous person
-
Page 103-124 - Romano Thomas, Baltimore Police Department mobile crime lab unit
-
Page 118 – the Don note is read to the court
-
Page 119 – insurance card referenced
-
Page 121 – floral paper is referenced
-
Page 126 – Juror says he/she was shot in a hold up attempt, judge asks “And you forgot about that?”
-
Page 127 – Judge says “So you just remembered that you were shot and you just remembered that that would stop you from being a good witness. Did you remember anything else yesterday?”, then dismisses the juror.
Overall impression: Dec 10 seemed fairly dry with a couple exceptions, e.g. CG calling Urick a... jerk. The crosses didn't seem to add a lot of value, but these witnesses were generally providing circumstantial evidence - it may not need to be handled like an eyewitness would be pressed by the defense.
Let me know if there's anything else that you found interesting or funny, along with a page number. Thanks!
Posted May 30, 2016, 12:47 AM UTC