The loan is a great deal from ROMA's perspective.
But from Arsenal and Szcz's pov this loan really doesnt make sense.
What do you guys make of it?
Posted Aug 17, 2016, 7:43 PM UTC
He joined the team just a week ago, he is not game fit.
The Giallorossi keeper officially returned to the club on 4 August and - although wary of the threat posed by Juventus - hopes Roma can sustain a challenge for the Scudetto.
2 weeks, from AS Roma official website, and I hope thats the reason he doesnt start, not optimistic tho.
How does it not makes sense? Szczesny won't get game time behind Cech and Ospina, might aswell put him out there and let him get game time, if Opsina wants to stay sell Szczesny, we can bring him back if he wants to fight for his place and hope he doesn't do stupid shit if Ospina decides he wants out.
It doesnt make sense because Scsz doesnt get game time either at Roma.
Either we sell him directly or loan him to another club to maintain his form and value. That would be the sensible option.
Lmao you're literally basing that off this game. He played 34 Serie A games last season + 8 CL games. This is the first non friendly game that Roma have played, Serie A hasn't even started and suddenly you know he won't get game time?
or maybe if you are clever enough you would have found out how many games in pre-season has Scsz started.
does it really take a lot of brainwork to figure out Roma has more incentive to start the GK they spent millions on and has a higher resale value?
Well if you're gonna start insulting me then you've clearly no faith in your own argument. So let's look at the facts instead of the assumptions you're making, AS Roma announced the loan on August 4th the day of the Montreal friendly, since then they've played 1 other friendly, let's not forget he was at the Euros, there could be multiple reasons why he hasn't played yet.
stop posting. you are hurting yourself.
shit poster without argument like you should stop embarrassing yourself from now on.
Verm sent off!
and to answer the question we should have sold with a buy back clause, it's very unlikely he'll be good enough to start for us again after Cech's too old, loaning is a bit dumb tbh
I'd wait for a few games to be sure. After all, Ospina started a few champions league games for is last year, but Cech was still our starter.
Has the Italian league started yet?
I don't understand why you use Ospina as an example. Is there any positive for us and scsz in value and form that we loan him to be a backup even he eventually does field in several games?
I agree the first serie A game against Udinese in 3 days will be the final straw for Scsz tho. There is still a very slim chance that he might be a league GK, and Alisson plays all the cup games.
I mentioned Ospina because he was our cup keeper, and Cech was our league, and half of our CL games, keeper.
We don't know for certain if Szczesny is now their second keeper, or will be playing their league games
I think Verm's had a great debut
lol when he signed for the them, in the r/soccer thread about it literally every Arsenal fans was down voted & told they was wrong when they said Vermaelen was a huge liability
already red carded, feel for him.
how many did he get for us?