Ray the CPA would probably get off
While most of us were hungry for justice and to discover the true murderer, can you imagine how hard it would be to get a conviction for Ray?
The defense at that trial would have a field day that the prosecution already took another suspect through a trial, that the other suspect admitted to stabbing and sleeping with the victim and was high on drugs, all of the evidence on the two of them, etc.
Nothing screams reasonable doubt like "the same prosecution and police who want you to believe this successful CPA did it, tried to make everyone think that immigrant druggie did it first."
Of course, like the first trial there might be a lot of evidence that just wasn't presented. But the case so far? Not spectacular.
And all because, against all odds, you have a situation with random sex, violence, and drugs, and another plausible murderer that all happened that night but didn't end in murder, and an actual murderer who just happens to strike at just the perfect time.
I mean, imagine if Naz wasn't knocked out. CPA shows up to kill one woman and finds a man and her to contend with. Either one gets away and it's trouble. But the guy is there to take the wrap but ineffective in stopping anything.
And strangely he commits the murder, it's horribly violent, he doesn't leave enough evidence there, an yet he leaves the scene like that? One wonders why he would not set a fire or remove the body, etc.
Of course these are not the concerns of this show. Just interesting things to ponder.
Posted Aug 29, 2016, 11:56 PM UTC