NEW WIKILEAKS! Podesta Emails Part 23: Email ID 36521+ Post what you find below #PodestaEmails23
#See also: WIKILEAKS CENTRAL STATION
#The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/
Email ID of Podesta Part 23:
#36521 - 37228
Podesta 23 announcement tweet: none yet
Link showing the new emails starting at 36521 : https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
#New comments MUST include the email ID, a link to the email, a quote from the email, and a sentence explaining why they think this email is of note.
Top level comments without an email ID or link to the email will be removed.
Anything under Email ID 36521 is certainly from an earlier release. Wikileaks assigns an Email ID to each email separately. In any email chain only the newest email contains unreleased content.
If you are interested in previously released emails, see the
WIKILEAKS CENTRAL navigational thread
Or go to past Podesta Email threads directly:
1 ,2 , 3, 4, 5, 6 , 7, 8, 9 ,10.1, 10.2, 11, 12, 12.5 , 13, 14, 15 , 16, 17, 18, 19 , 20, 21 ,22
#WARNING: CNN authorization is required to view this discussion of the Podesta 23 emails except for highly trained Reddit specialists.
More discussion on the infamous Doug Band memo about Teneo, which revealed corruption and inurement by the Clintons. They were using "charity" to personally enrich themselves to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. Doug is worried that if the "story gets out" Teneo, the company involved in the scheme will have to be shut down completely:
Need get this asap to them although I'm sure cvc won't believe it to be true bc she doesn't want to Even though the facts speak for themselves. John, I would appreciate your feedback and any suggestions
I'm also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36761
#ROBERT CREAMER FROM #VERITASVIDEOS IS CLOSE TO ROBBY MOOK
From Michael Lux to Neera Tanden, who forwarded it to Podesta with the comment : "From your buddy"
Michael Lux is a member of DemocracyPartners . Lux writes :
Hey Neera,
Just wanted to pass along this note I sent to Bob Creamer, who as you may know is consulting for the DNC and is close to Robby Mook. Wanted to pass it along to you as well, hoping you won’t take offense because I feel some urgency about this.
This is a huge confirmation of Bob Creamer's deep involvement with the Hillary Clinton campaign! This is from December 2015 only a few months before Robert Creamer's group incited great violence at the Chicago Trump rally.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37101
A long email from Brent Budowsky, who is a journalist but clearly views himself as one of the main advisers of John Podesta:
I have been very aggressive defending her and avoiding any criticism while she was under attack but this is now going very wrong and when I read the NYT story that reconfirms my view, never publicly stated, that some of the people around her---not you but others---are dumber than bird shit when it comes to modern public opinion and modern politics.
Some of Clinton's people are "dumber than bird shit." Who was Budowsky thinking about here? Neear? Huma? Philippe Reines?
I could write a column listing one by one the corporate clients of many of Hillary's closest advisors and many Democrats would puke. I have researched this, and it is appalling, and these are people attuned to making money from whomever writes their checks,
Budowsky "have researched" the Democrat corruption but he would not act like a journalist if it is detrimental to Democrat party interests.
There are some people now working for her who consider her a profit center for their income and not a cause or a mission that they believe in. They almost certainly carry with them an incredible jealousy that Obama has always harbored towards Bill Clinton and a condescending attitude towards Hillary Clinton.
One could argue that the Clintons have created the Clinton Foundation and other vehicles partially for this reason to be able to provide a steady income to their underlings. To provide a payout a "profit center" for staffers and aides who help them get elected. Who work for them not because they believe in them or the policies they represent, but for cold, hard cash. Between elections, even when they were private citizens, the Clinton Foundation could always pay a large number of staffers to work on Clinton related issues from all the donations that supposedly were given for "charity".
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36689
Judd Legum reached out to John Podesta because he was planning to undercut an upcoming WaPo story:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Judd Legum wrote: Benghazi Dems fearing very bad WashPost story have given us the details so we can be fairer. Anything I should know?
Read: Benghazi Dems learned of an upcoming WaPo aritcle and were working in the background with people like Judd Legum to produce some propaganda to counter the "very bad WashPost story".
looks like WashPost beat us so we'll pass
Podesta responds : "Sorry. I was on a plane."
Posted Oct 30, 2016, 1:18 PM UTC · edited