[OC] A refutation

Actually, Noah wrote the voynich manuscript original, which John Dee translated to the Atlantean high abecedary using the legendary plant substitution scheme. Part of the problem with deciphering it is we no longer know what silphium looked like.

At any rate, the original book of Enoch can be used in a pinch. Not the one the Coptic church uses, which is a forgery designed to hide the true identities of the Watchers, but the original which Jude quoted from. It can be distinguished from the forgery primarily by its account of the near passby of Mars, so clearly detailed by Velikovsky and supported by the two moons of Mars in Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's travels. Not coincidentally, the Brobdingnag people are the very same gigantes or nephilim that the Greek Titans are based on.

It goes without saying that Ouranos is Nimrod and Gaia is Semiramis. Making the Yule log (infant Tammuz) crystalline clear.

But of course one can bypass all this work by simply reading the tale in the stars of the Mazzaroth, the origin of the Babylonian corruption we know as the Zodiac.

I apologize for going on at length about such basic knowledge, but just in case anyone was unaware, I thought it worth mentioning.

Incidentally, the antikythera artifact is a red herring. It was merely used to interpret dreams of Adam Kadmon in order to rediscover the names he gave to all the creatures. If one calls them by name they will speak. Dogs and dolphins have been trying for ages to clue us in about this. Cats take joy in taunting us. Hummingbirds still speak the Universal Tongue, which Adam knew and taught to his descendants, albeit far too fast for us to understand.

Thank goodness we found the Copper Scroll or all of this would have remained lost.

Edit: thank God for the Khazars, huh?