Source
megarock35•

Was looking at the new info added a few days ago and noticed something worth pointing out. Look at the pictures of all colored text: anything dealing with pets has a black gradient, while anything dealing with people has a white gradient. Interesting that it has such a clear distinction, especially since the child library distinguishes between the two...

I will say I'm not positive if Mike's name follows the pattern, though. At least not by that picture. Even if he doesn't, it could be because he's dead?

E: or it could be because all the Even Care text had a white background and the Newmaker Plane text has a black background and I'm just over thinking this lmao

5
itaboranius•

Thanks for this!

3
birdinspace•

In the description of Pen -- it's yarmulke, not "yamaka"

3
walklikeamanoorah•

Very nice document so far. Some of my commentary on the note in Care's room-

So perhaps her dad was abusive to her and in a way sadistic? As it says when she was not growing her eyebrows back (results of trichitillomania resulting from child abuse), "you" in the note pretended not to know why. And it said that "you" thought about it in the -bathtub- later. Maybe it gives the dad some sick sexual pleasure? Honestly this is legit screwed up this arg goes really deep.

3
hungrylumasthat's a puzzle•

the "you're in the bath" part is definitely the creepiest part of petscop to me so far

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
valzilla2000OPDaisy-Head Mayzie•

I actually don't have any connection with the creators of this document. Apparently if you contact @nullsharp on Discord they'll set it up so you can edit?

3
Feigte[REDACTED]•

Is nobody updating this anymore?

2
valzilla2000OPDaisy-Head Mayzie•

I'm not sure. I have no connection with the document, but someone suggested I sticky it. I guess @nullsharp on Discord is the one to ask about editing it.

If it has stopped being updated, I can unsticky and add a link to the Petscop Wiki instead? But I will admit that I haven't even looked in there, either.

1
dudemo•

Since it hasn't been updated since Petscop 7, I'd probably drop it. I'm not sure I would sticky the wiki though, either. It's pretty vacant and isn't maintained.

This might be the time to start our own document/wiki!

1
valzilla2000OPDaisy-Head Mayzie•

Ya know, you make a good point. I think I'm gonna unsticky it and perhaps make a welcome message in a little bit.

2
GnomoP•

Somethings I noted about the Document that could be improved. I'm not an expert in document formatting design, so feel free to disregard these notes:

  • Link to the Table of Contents, on the Table of Contents, it's silly af lmao
  • The red coloring for the text underneath pieces of information doesn't really make it clear why should the text be red nor what makes it important to highlight separatedly,
  • Cursive and italic text has the same issues as the red text.
  • Some cumbersome external hyperlink citations/sources could be shortened like this, if possible.
1
valzilla2000OPDaisy-Head Mayzie•

I just linked it because someone suggested I sticky it. As far as I know, we're not actually involved with the document. I hear you can contribute if you message nullsharp on Discord, though.

1